Mass in the Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) Why the Higgs Particle is Unnecessary.

The Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) eliminates the need for the Higgs mechanism and the Higgs particle by providing an alternative, unified explanation for mass rooted in the geometry and tension dynamics of the Substrate, referred to as S.
Mass in the Reactive Substrate Theory (RST):
(∂²S/∂t² − α(t) · c² · ∇²S + β · S³) = α(t) · σ(x, t) · FR(C[Ψ])
The core principle of RST is that matter is not a separate entity, but a bound, localized geometry of the Substrate (S), while usable energy is the controlled, self-sustaining potential (represented by the term beta S cubed) that maintains that geometry.
The RST Equation of Motion describes the behavior of the Substrate under various influences:
Wave Propagation minus Dissipation plus Potential or Bound Energy equals Source or Interaction.
The equation is:
(second derivative of S with respect to time) minus (alpha of t times c squared times the Laplacian of S) plus (beta times S cubed) equals (alpha of t times sigma of x and t times F sub R of C of psi).
The term sigma of x and t represents the sigma Soliton, which is the fundamental knot of matter. In RST, the mass of a particle is not derived from interaction with an external field, but from the inherent, localized tension density of this Soliton.
Mass is Localized Tension:
A particle's mass is a measure of the bound Substrate tension required to form and sustain its Soliton geometry. More mass means a denser, more tightly knotted structure in the Substrate.
The beta S cubed Term (Potential or Self-Sustaining Energy):
This term represents the non-linear, self-interacting potential that allows the Soliton to maintain its shape and prevent its tension from dispersing back into the ambient Substrate. This is the source of the particle's internal, bound energy.
Why the Higgs Particle is Unnecessary:
The Higgs mechanism gives particles mass by dragging them down as they move through the omnipresent Higgs Field. RST offers a simpler, intrinsic explanation.
In the Standard Model, the source of mass is interaction with an external field, the Higgs Field. In RST, the source of mass is the intrinsic property of the particle's localized tension geometry.
In the Standard Model, particle mass is proportional to the coupling strength to the Higgs Field. In RST, particle mass is proportional to the tension density of the sigma Soliton.
The Standard Model requires a new, separate, fundamental field and its excitation, the Higgs boson, to explain mass. RST uses the single Substrate (S). Mass is a geometric property of S, not a separate interaction.
In RST, particles possess mass intrinsically because they are a localized tension state of the Substrate, known as sigma Solitons. They do not need to wade through a separate field to acquire that property. Their very existence as stable knots of tension is their mass. The beta S cubed term ensures they stay knotted, eliminating the need for a separate Higgs field to provide stability.

Popular posts from this blog

Conceptual Summary #2: (∂t2​S−c2∇2S+βS3)=σ(x,t)⋅FR​(C[Ψ])

Image
The tests designed to find the Aether—principally the Michelson-Morley experiment (M-M)—would be largely ineffective at detecting the fundamental S field (Substrate) in the Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) framework, though their null results are highly compatible with RST's structure. The reason lies in the distinct conceptual definition and behavior of the two media. The Test: Michelson-Morley and the Aether. The M-M experiment was designed to detect the "aether wind," a predicted change in the speed of light caused by the Earth's motion relative to a stationary, rigid medium—the classical Luminiferous Aether. Classical Aether: A static, absolute reference frame; an elastic, passive, material-like medium that fills space and serves as a carrier for light waves. Predicted Result: Light traveling parallel to Earth's motion through the Aether should be slightly slower than light traveling perpendicular to it. Actual Result (Null Result): No significant differenc...
Read more

The Non-Attraction Model of Gravity: From Attraction to Displacement: RST's Theory of Gravitational Push..

Image
Brief on the Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) RST posits that all of reality—matter, energy, space, and time—emerges from a single, continuous, non-material field called the Substrate (S). Matter: Defined as a σ Soliton, a stable, localized "knot of tension" in the S-field, replacing the concept of a point particle. Energy: Defined as dynamic, propagating tension (waves) in the S-field. Unification: RST views E=mc2 as the conservation of Substrate tension: mass is stored tension; energy is tension in motion. Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) fundamentally redefines gravity as a Substrate tension gradient, which is the mechanism underlying the "buoyant" view of gravity. This explanation also clarifies why the Michelson-Morley (M-M) experiment failed to find the classical Aether, supporting the RST concept of a dynamic Substrate. In essence, gravity is "buoyant" in RST because matter (high tension) sinks into a less-strained S-Field (lower tension...
Read more

Beyond the Flaws: Why RST Succeeds Where Push Gravity and EM-Aether Failed to Unify the Void

Image
RST vs. Extended Electromagnetic Theories (Pre-Relativity) These theories attempted to unify all forces by making gravity a secondary or residual effect of electromagnetism, treating space as an electromagnetic Aether. Why Extended EM Theories Failed Gravity's Independence: The most critical failure is that gravity does not behave like a polarizable electromagnetic force. Gravity affects all matter equally (the equivalence principle), regardless of its charge or composition, which a secondary electromagnetic effect would not do. No Gravitational Shielding: Electromagnetic fields can be shielded (Faraday cage), but gravity cannot.1 This fundamentally contradicts the idea that gravity is an electrical or magnetic residual force. Conflict with GR: They could not accurately predict or explain phenomena later verified by General Relativity (GR), such as the exact amount of light bending around the Sun or the precession of Mercury's orbit. RST vs. Le Sage's The...
Read more