Quantum Entanglement in Reactive Substrate Theory (RST)

Quantum Entanglement in Reactive Substrate Theory (RST)
In RST, quantum entanglement is not “spooky action at a distance,” but the persistent, synchronized oscillatory state of two distant Substrate tension knots (σ Solitons) that were once locally bound.
RST Wave Equation Foundation The generalized RST wave equation provides the basis for this interpretation:
(∂²S/∂t² − α(t)·c²∇²S + βS³) = α(t)·σ(x,t)·FR(C[Ψ])
1. The Entangled State: Bound Geometry of the Substrate (S)
When two particles (e.g., photons or electrons) become entangled, their σ Solitons form a single, coherent, localized tension structure in the Substrate.
The term FR(C[Ψ]) represents the Resonant Force maintaining the combined tension geometry of the entangled pair’s physical and conscious state.
Their properties (spin, polarization) are phase-locked as a unified oscillation mode of Substrate tension.
2. Separation and Non-Local Correlation
Upon separation, the σ Soliton geometry splits into two distinct, distant knots.
These knots remain phase-locked due to the persistent Substrate tension link.
The βS³ term sustains this link, even across spatial separation described by ∇²S.
The original oscillation continues as a tension feedback loop across the Substrate.
3. Measurement and Instantaneous Collapse
Measuring particle A causes a local perturbation in Substrate tension, destabilizing its σ Soliton.
This disturbance is instantly transmitted to particle B via the unbroken tension link (FR term).
Because the link is a tension state of the Substrate, it is not constrained by the speed of light.
Particle B’s oscillation mode is symmetrically forced into its correlated state, preserving coherence.
Conclusion Entanglement in RST is a shared, continuous vibration of the Substrate between two distant matter knots. Measurement of one knot instantly sets the boundary condition for the other, because both remain part of the same extended wave function within the Substrate.

Popular posts from this blog

THE GOLDEN BALLROOM/BUNKER

Conceptual Summary #2: (∂t2​S−c2∇2S+βS3)=σ(x,t)⋅FR​(C[Ψ])

Trump has painted a fascinating “economic science fiction” scenario 💥