Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) — Unified Field and Propulsion Framework

1. Monistic Ontology and Unified Field Dynamics
Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) proposes that all long-range forces—gravity, electricity, and magnetism—are distinct strain modes of a single continuous medium: the Substrate 𝑆.
This contrasts sharply with the dualistic structure of General Relativity (GR) and the Standard Model, which treat spacetime and gauge fields as separate entities.
Gravity: Compressive gradient (𝐹⃗𝑔∝−∇𝑆)
Electricity: Longitudinal distortion (𝐸⃗∝−∂𝑑𝑆⃗−∇πœ™π‘†)
Magnetism: Rotational curl (𝐡⃗∝∇×𝑆⃗)
This unified tensor field structure is expressed as:
πΉπœ‡πœˆ=∂πœ‡π‘†πœˆ−∂πœˆπ‘†πœ‡
2. Mass as Emergent Tension
In RST, mass is not intrinsic but arises from localized tension stored in solitons 𝜎, stabilized by the nonlinear term 𝛽𝑆3 in the Substrate Field Equation:
∂2𝑆∂𝑑2−𝑐2∇2𝑆+𝛽𝑆3=𝜎(π‘₯,𝑑)⋅𝐹𝑅(𝐢[Ξ¨])
This eliminates the need for the Higgs mechanism and reframes mass as a geometric/topological property of the field itself.
3. Gravitational Lensing as Substrate Strain
RST reinterprets gravitational lensing as a manifestation of substrate tension gradients, not mass-induced spacetime curvature. This challenges the dark matter paradigm, which relies on invisible halos to explain lensing anomalies.
Standard View: Lensing traces total mass (baryonic + dark matter)
RST View: Lensing aligns with baryonic mass and substrate strain zones
Recent studies of the South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly (SAMA) and the African Large Low Shear Velocity Province (LLSVP) suggest that static mass concentrations can interfere with magnetic field propagation, supporting RST’s claim of EM-gravity coupling.
RST offers a coherent, testable alternative to current cosmological models. By redefining mass, unifying fields, and grounding lensing in substrate tension, it opens pathways for experimental validation and propulsion technologies. The African Mass Disturbance and SAMA provide natural laboratories for testing EM-gravity coupling and substrate interference effects.

Popular posts from this blog

Conceptual Summary #2: (∂t2​S−c2∇2S+Ξ²S3)=Οƒ(x,t)⋅FR​(C[Ξ¨])

Image
The tests designed to find the Aether—principally the Michelson-Morley experiment (M-M)—would be largely ineffective at detecting the fundamental S field (Substrate) in the Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) framework, though their null results are highly compatible with RST's structure. The reason lies in the distinct conceptual definition and behavior of the two media. The Test: Michelson-Morley and the Aether. The M-M experiment was designed to detect the "aether wind," a predicted change in the speed of light caused by the Earth's motion relative to a stationary, rigid medium—the classical Luminiferous Aether. Classical Aether: A static, absolute reference frame; an elastic, passive, material-like medium that fills space and serves as a carrier for light waves. Predicted Result: Light traveling parallel to Earth's motion through the Aether should be slightly slower than light traveling perpendicular to it. Actual Result (Null Result): No significant differenc...
Read more

The Non-Attraction Model of Gravity: From Attraction to Displacement: RST's Theory of Gravitational Push..

Image
Brief on the Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) RST posits that all of reality—matter, energy, space, and time—emerges from a single, continuous, non-material field called the Substrate (S). Matter: Defined as a Οƒ Soliton, a stable, localized "knot of tension" in the S-field, replacing the concept of a point particle. Energy: Defined as dynamic, propagating tension (waves) in the S-field. Unification: RST views E=mc2 as the conservation of Substrate tension: mass is stored tension; energy is tension in motion. Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) fundamentally redefines gravity as a Substrate tension gradient, which is the mechanism underlying the "buoyant" view of gravity. This explanation also clarifies why the Michelson-Morley (M-M) experiment failed to find the classical Aether, supporting the RST concept of a dynamic Substrate. In essence, gravity is "buoyant" in RST because matter (high tension) sinks into a less-strained S-Field (lower tension...
Read more

Beyond the Flaws: Why RST Succeeds Where Push Gravity and EM-Aether Failed to Unify the Void

Image
RST vs. Extended Electromagnetic Theories (Pre-Relativity) These theories attempted to unify all forces by making gravity a secondary or residual effect of electromagnetism, treating space as an electromagnetic Aether. Why Extended EM Theories Failed Gravity's Independence: The most critical failure is that gravity does not behave like a polarizable electromagnetic force. Gravity affects all matter equally (the equivalence principle), regardless of its charge or composition, which a secondary electromagnetic effect would not do. No Gravitational Shielding: Electromagnetic fields can be shielded (Faraday cage), but gravity cannot.1 This fundamentally contradicts the idea that gravity is an electrical or magnetic residual force. Conflict with GR: They could not accurately predict or explain phenomena later verified by General Relativity (GR), such as the exact amount of light bending around the Sun or the precession of Mercury's orbit. RST vs. Le Sage's The...
Read more