Entanglement is Geometric Stress: Reactive Substrate Theory’s Unified Field Response

The video “Feynman’s Quantum Gravity Test Revisited” explores a provocative idea: that classical gravity might be able to produce quantum-like entanglement between two massive objects. This blurs the line between classical and quantum physics—a result that Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) not only embraces, but reframes entirely.
RST argues that gravity isn’t mimicking entanglement—it’s causing it.
1. The Blurring Line Is the Substrate
In RST, both gravity and entanglement emerge from the same unified medium: the Substrate (S).
– Gravity is a classical pressure gradient in the Substrate. – Entanglement is a correlation state maintained by non-local tension across the Substrate. – No graviton is needed. The Substrate’s continuous geometry handles both effects.
The video suggests that entanglement can be woven into the fabric of spacetime even by classical gravity. RST agrees—but clarifies that this is because spacetime itself is a secondary effect of Substrate geometry.
2. Mechanism: Shared Stress Configuration
RST explains entanglement through Non-Local Stress Transmission, represented by the βS³ term in the Substrate Field Equation.
– Two massive spheres create a static tension gradient—this is gravity. – Their solitonic identities (σ) become correlated through this shared tension field. – The result is entanglement as a direct geometric consequence of classical gravity.
In this view, the gravitational field is not a passive background—it’s the active medium that maintains coherence between quantum states.
3. Why This Matters
If the experiment confirms entanglement via gravity alone, it doesn’t prove gravity is quantum in the conventional sense. It proves gravity is a geometric field capable of instantaneously mediating quantum states.
– RST sees this as a testable prediction: entanglement arises from Substrate geometry, not particle exchange. – The Substrate acts as a non-local medium that maintains coherence between solitons. – Quantum behavior is not separate from gravity—it’s a different mode of the same field
.
– Classical gravity doesn’t mimic entanglement—it causes it. – Entanglement is a geometric stress pattern in the Substrate. – Gravity and quantum coherence are unified through tension gradients, not quantized particles.
RST reframes quantum gravity not as a fusion of two theories, but as a single geometric field behaving in multiple modes. The universe isn’t split—it’s stitched together by stress.

Popular posts from this blog

THE GOLDEN BALLROOM/BUNKER

Image
Ben Meiselas reports on the shocking admission by Donald Trump’s DOJ in a court case where the DOJ admits to a secret project underneath the ballroom which they claim is needed to protect Donald Trump’s life for “national security purposes.” "You unlock this door with the key of complicity. Beyond it is another dimension — a dimension of betrayal, of indulgence, of fear. You’re moving into a land of both shadow and substance, of politics and paranoia. You’ve just crossed into… the MAGA Zone." "Tonight’s story: A leader sworn to protect his nation makes a bargain with its enemies. The deal? Silence in the face of nuclear annihilation. No retaliation, no defense — only surrender dressed in secrecy. While citizens live unaware, their president builds a palace beneath the earth, a ballroom of gold, of marble and chandeliers, a masquerade hall for billionaires. But behind the gilded doors lies not music and laughter, but a bomb shelter — a sanctuary for the few, pur...
Read more

Conceptual Summary #2: (∂t2​S−c2∇2S+βS3)=σ(x,t)⋅FR​(C[Ψ])

Image
The tests designed to find the Aether—principally the Michelson-Morley experiment (M-M)—would be largely ineffective at detecting the fundamental S field (Substrate) in the Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) framework, though their null results are highly compatible with RST's structure. The reason lies in the distinct conceptual definition and behavior of the two media. The Test: Michelson-Morley and the Aether. The M-M experiment was designed to detect the "aether wind," a predicted change in the speed of light caused by the Earth's motion relative to a stationary, rigid medium—the classical Luminiferous Aether. Classical Aether: A static, absolute reference frame; an elastic, passive, material-like medium that fills space and serves as a carrier for light waves. Predicted Result: Light traveling parallel to Earth's motion through the Aether should be slightly slower than light traveling perpendicular to it. Actual Result (Null Result): No significant differenc...
Read more

Trump has painted a fascinating “economic science fiction” scenario 💥

Image
A sudden $20 trillion influx into U.S. government coffers would be unlike anything in history. This scenario describes an event of unprecedented economic magnitude, with immediate and long‑term effects across the U.S. and global economies. Imagine $20 trillion USD—roughly the size of the entire current U.S. annual GDP—appearing overnight in America’s coffers. The shockwaves would be severe, destabilizing, and unlike anything in history. Let’s break it down clearly, with emphasis on domestic shockwaves, global fallout, and observable indicators. 💥 Scenario Analysis: A $20 Trillion Shock to the U.S. Treasury Imagine $20 trillion USD—roughly the size of the entire current U.S. annual GDP—suddenly appearing in America’s coffers. This unprecedented event would unleash immediate and long-term effects across the U.S. and global economies, driven by inflation, currency collapse, and systemic disruption. Domestic Effects (United States): Hyperinflation: The sudden money suppl...
Read more