Magnetic Fields and the Reactive Substrate Theory (RST)

🧲 Magnetic Fields and the Reactive Substrate Theory (RST)

The video “Electromagnets + Interactions between Magnets – Real Experiments & Field Maps” provides detailed, real-world mapping of magnetic fields. This is highly useful for the Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) because it offers empirical context for how RST models the Electromagnetic Force as an emergent property of the single Substrate Field (Σ). Below are the key extractions and interpretations.

1️⃣ Magnetic Field as Substrate Strain Patterns

RST posits that electromagnetism is not mediated by a separate photon particle, but is instead a strain or pressure wave within the continuous Σ Substrate.

  • Field as Strain: The “fascinating shapes that emerge from magnets” (00:15) and the detailed “interaction maps between magnets” (00:29) are, in RST terms, visual representations of stable, localized strain patterns that the Σ Field adopts due to the presence of matter (Σ Solitons).
  • Neutral Points: The detection of “a neutral point” (00:48) where the sensor registers no field corresponds to a point in the Σ Substrate where the vector sum of all localized magnetic strain waves is precisely zero. This demonstrates localized equilibrium within the continuous field.

2️⃣ Measurement Angle and Reactive Feedback (FR(C[Ψ]))

The video emphasizes a crucial quantum concept: the measurement itself strongly influences the observed result.

  • Observation-Dependent Field: The finding that magnetic field maps are “highly dependent on the angle of measurement” (01:12) and that changing the angle can “easily produce hundreds of different maps” (01:46) supports RST’s principle of Emergent Reality and Coherence.
  • RST Interpretation: This aligns with the Reactive Feedback term (FR(C[Ψ])) in the advanced RST equation. It suggests that the informational context (method, angle, and act of measurement) influences the localized coherence of Σ Soliton clusters, thereby altering the emergent strain pattern (the magnetic field) being observed. The field is not static, but a dynamic Σ strain pattern partly structured by the observing system.

3️⃣ Electromagnets and Dynamic Field Generation

The experiments with electromagnets and iron cores directly relate to how RST models energy and matter’s impact on the Σ Field.

  • Current and Strain: An electric current is modeled in RST as the coherent flow of Σ Solitons (electrons). Increasing the current — “pushing the voltages to the limit” (03:26) — increases coherent motion, which in turn increases large-scale, dynamic strain in the surrounding Σ Substrate, thereby strengthening the magnetic field.
  • Core Amplification: When an iron core is inserted, the magnetic field “expands significantly” (05:13). In RST, the iron core’s atomic structure provides a more compliant or structured pathway within the Σ Substrate, allowing induced Σ strain waves to propagate and amplify more efficiently, resulting in a stronger emergent magnetic field.

💡 Takeaway

This video demonstrates that magnetic fields are not abstract lines but real, dynamic strain patterns in a continuous medium. For RST, these experiments provide empirical support for the idea that electromagnetism emerges from the Σ Field’s tension and coherence. Neutral points, measurement dependence, and amplification effects all reinforce the view that the electromagnetic force is a manifestation of substrate dynamics, not a separate particle exchange. In short, magnetism is a window into the deeper mechanics of the Substrate Field.

Popular posts from this blog

Conceptual Summary #2: (∂t2​S−c2∇2S+βS3)=σ(x,t)⋅FR​(C[Ψ])

Image
The tests designed to find the Aether—principally the Michelson-Morley experiment (M-M)—would be largely ineffective at detecting the fundamental S field (Substrate) in the Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) framework, though their null results are highly compatible with RST's structure. The reason lies in the distinct conceptual definition and behavior of the two media. The Test: Michelson-Morley and the Aether. The M-M experiment was designed to detect the "aether wind," a predicted change in the speed of light caused by the Earth's motion relative to a stationary, rigid medium—the classical Luminiferous Aether. Classical Aether: A static, absolute reference frame; an elastic, passive, material-like medium that fills space and serves as a carrier for light waves. Predicted Result: Light traveling parallel to Earth's motion through the Aether should be slightly slower than light traveling perpendicular to it. Actual Result (Null Result): No significant differenc...
Read more

The Non-Attraction Model of Gravity: From Attraction to Displacement: RST's Theory of Gravitational Push..

Image
Brief on the Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) RST posits that all of reality—matter, energy, space, and time—emerges from a single, continuous, non-material field called the Substrate (S). Matter: Defined as a σ Soliton, a stable, localized "knot of tension" in the S-field, replacing the concept of a point particle. Energy: Defined as dynamic, propagating tension (waves) in the S-field. Unification: RST views E=mc2 as the conservation of Substrate tension: mass is stored tension; energy is tension in motion. Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) fundamentally redefines gravity as a Substrate tension gradient, which is the mechanism underlying the "buoyant" view of gravity. This explanation also clarifies why the Michelson-Morley (M-M) experiment failed to find the classical Aether, supporting the RST concept of a dynamic Substrate. In essence, gravity is "buoyant" in RST because matter (high tension) sinks into a less-strained S-Field (lower tension...
Read more

Beyond the Flaws: Why RST Succeeds Where Push Gravity and EM-Aether Failed to Unify the Void

Image
RST vs. Extended Electromagnetic Theories (Pre-Relativity) These theories attempted to unify all forces by making gravity a secondary or residual effect of electromagnetism, treating space as an electromagnetic Aether. Why Extended EM Theories Failed Gravity's Independence: The most critical failure is that gravity does not behave like a polarizable electromagnetic force. Gravity affects all matter equally (the equivalence principle), regardless of its charge or composition, which a secondary electromagnetic effect would not do. No Gravitational Shielding: Electromagnetic fields can be shielded (Faraday cage), but gravity cannot.1 This fundamentally contradicts the idea that gravity is an electrical or magnetic residual force. Conflict with GR: They could not accurately predict or explain phenomena later verified by General Relativity (GR), such as the exact amount of light bending around the Sun or the precession of Mercury's orbit. RST vs. Le Sage's The...
Read more