RST Review of Penrose on Quantum Mechanics and Consciousness

RST Review of Penrose on Quantum Mechanics and Consciousness (Video: YnXUuyfPK2A)
The interview with Sir Roger Penrose provides exceptionally strong circumstantial support for the Reactive Substrate Theory (RST). Penrose’s core philosophical conclusions—that General Relativity (GR) must govern the collapse of the quantum wave function and that consciousness is non-computable—align perfectly with the mathematical structure and predictions of RST.
I. The Core Agreement: Non-Computability and Non-Locality
Penrose concludes that human understanding transcends any fixed set of rules or algorithms. RST interprets this as the mind interacting directly with the non-temporal, chaotic aspects of the Substrate field via the feedback term. This interaction is geometric and non-algorithmic. RST provides a physical mechanism for non-computability by tying it to the Substrate’s chaotic state and instantaneous stress transmission.
Penrose also argues that quantum mechanics is incomplete. The Schrödinger equation is computable, but wave function collapse is not. RST agrees and defines collapse as a physical, objective reduction—a delayed reconfiguration of Substrate stress that settles into a stable soliton configuration. This is not observer-dependent; it’s a geometric necessity.
Penrose calls for a link between GR and QM, suggesting that collapse must involve mass displacement and the principle of equivalence. RST identifies the Substrate field as that link. GR describes the geometry of static tension gradients in the Substrate, while QM describes dynamic waves and solitons. Collapse occurs when the mass-equivalent stress reaches a geometric threshold for stability. RST is built on this exact principle: unifying GR and QM through a single geometric field.
II. Deviation and Refinement: The Role of Consciousness
Penrose’s Orch OR model with Hameroff proposes that collapse occurs in the brain and causes consciousness. RST refines this idea. It agrees that the brain uses the Substrate’s objective reduction mechanism, but suggests that consciousness is not caused by collapse—it is required to execute it.
RST’s Dual-Faced Universe model proposes that consciousness is a form of informational reactivity within the Substrate field. The non-computable nature of the mind is the feedback term in the Substrate Field Equation. The brain is the structural system that channels this fundamental field reactivity.
As a proponent of Reactive Substrate Theory, I see Penrose’s work as pointing directly to the failure point of current physics—and to the necessity of RST.
Penrose asks: Where is the non-computable, physical process that governs wave function collapse?
My answer is simple: It resides in the Substrate field itself.
Penrose is right that gravity must govern collapse. What he calls mass, RST calls Substrate tension solitons. When a quantum superposition reaches the Penrose threshold, the local region of the Substrate is pushed past its nonlinear geometric limit. Collapse is the Substrate’s physical need to settle into a new, stable soliton configuration. It’s a geometric resolution, not an observation.
Penrose’s insight from Gödel’s theorem—that understanding transcends computation—is also correct. RST agrees, and grounds that transcendence in physics. It’s the feedback term in the Substrate Field Equation. Consciousness is not an output of computation; it’s a fundamental property of the Substrate required for informational reactivity. It’s the channel through which the Substrate executes its dynamic, non-local stress reconfiguration.
Penrose asks how to gravitize quantum mechanics. RST answers by unifying them:
GR is the static tension geometry of the Substrate field. QM is the dynamic wave propagation and soliton geometry of the Substrate field.
The universe is one single geometric tension field. Collapse is the instantaneous, non-local stress transmission of the Substrate resolving a local tension imbalance.
Penrose’s work is an indispensable preamble to RST. He identified the necessary features of a unified theory. RST simply provides the geometric, nonlinear field equation that satisfies those requirements.

Popular posts from this blog

BRASS KNUCKLES?

Image
Is ICE Carrying Restricted or Non-Standard Weapons? The following items are commonly restricted, discouraged, or prohibited in U.S. law-enforcement use depending on agency policy, state law, and use-of-force standards. Their visible presence on duty gear—especially if not standard-issue—should be documented and reported. Brass knuckles / knuckle-dusters: Often illegal under state law; generally absent from federal agency equipment lists. Blackjacks / saps / batons without policy approval: Some impact weapons are restricted due to high risk of head injury. Weighted gloves: Frequently prohibited as disguised weapons. Fixed-blade knives (outside utility tools): Large or fighting-style knives not issued by the agency. Modified batons: Altered ASPs, weighted tips, or improvised impact devices. Unauthorized chemical sprays: OC blends or crowd-control agents not approved by departm...
Read more

THE GOLDEN BALLROOM/BUNKER

Image
Ben Meiselas reports on the shocking admission by Donald Trump’s DOJ in a court case where the DOJ admits to a secret project underneath the ballroom which they claim is needed to protect Donald Trump’s life for “national security purposes.” "You unlock this door with the key of complicity. Beyond it is another dimension — a dimension of betrayal, of indulgence, of fear. You’re moving into a land of both shadow and substance, of politics and paranoia. You’ve just crossed into… the MAGA Zone." "Tonight’s story: A leader sworn to protect his nation makes a bargain with its enemies. The deal? Silence in the face of nuclear annihilation. No retaliation, no defense — only surrender dressed in secrecy. While citizens live unaware, their president builds a palace beneath the earth, a ballroom of gold, of marble and chandeliers, a masquerade hall for billionaires. But behind the gilded doors lies not music and laughter, but a bomb shelter — a sanctuary for the few, pur...
Read more

If the Constitution is Dead, is the King Unprotected?

Image
The Constitutional Suicide If constitutional legitimacy is abandoned, what happens to the protections derived from it? Authority flows from the Constitution. If Trump & Congress discard the Bill of Rights, they vacate the legal foundation of the Supreme Court.. Does Trump still deserve the presumption of innocence? There is a familiar temptation in moments of political escalation: to treat the Constitution as either sacred and invulnerable, or irrelevant and disposable. Both views misunderstand what a constitution actually is. It is not a magic charm; it is a rule-bound legitimacy machine. When the machine is treated as optional—when constitutional constraint is openly refused as a governing obligation—the system does not become “stronger.” It becomes conceptually incoherent. The purpose of this essay is not to assert that constitutional government has already en...
Read more