Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) Applied to “Galactic Velocity Curves and MOND.

Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) Applied to “Galactic Velocity Curves and MOND: a Conversation with @IndependentPhysics”

In the video “Galactic Velocity Curves and MOND”, Manuel Palomo explores how Mach’s Principle can provide a physical basis for Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND), offering an alternative to Dark Matter in explaining flat galactic rotation curves. Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) fits naturally into this picture, supplying a concrete mechanical medium—the Substrate—that mediates inertia and large-scale dynamics.

1. The Substrate as the Mediator of Mach’s Principle

The video emphasizes that inertia is not an intrinsic property but arises from an object’s interaction with the mass of the entire universe (Mach’s Principle). RST identifies the Substrate as the physical mechanism behind this relational inertia.

  • Substrate Knot: In RST, a particle is a localized configuration of Substrate tension, a “knot” denoted by σ.
  • Displacement: Moving this knot requires displacing the surrounding Substrate field.
  • Back-Pressure: The resistance encountered during this displacement is Substrate Back-Pressure, which manifests as inertial mass.

Thus, inertia becomes a measure of how strongly a particle is coupled to the global Substrate, in agreement with Machian ideas.

2. MOND as Variable Substrate Drag

MOND introduces a characteristic acceleration scale, \( a_0 \approx 10^{-10} \,\text{m/s}^2 \), below which standard Newtonian dynamics appear to break down. The video presents MOND as a modification of inertia or gravity at low accelerations, especially in galactic outskirts.

RST interprets this behavior as a consequence of Substrate tension gradients across a galaxy:

  • Galactic Core: High matter density keeps the Substrate “stiff,” leading to familiar Newtonian inertia.
  • Galactic Rim: Lower matter density reduces Substrate tension, making the medium effectively “softer.”

With reduced Substrate tension at the edges, a star experiences less Substrate drag for the same orbital motion. This lower Back-Pressure allows higher rotational velocities than predicted by Newtonian gravity alone, naturally reproducing flat rotation curves without invoking Dark Matter.

3. The Physical Basis of the MOND Constant \( a_0 \)

A key point in the video is the apparent coincidence that the MOND acceleration scale \( a_0 \) is numerically similar to the gravitational field intensity associated with the entire visible universe.

In RST, this is understood as the Global Substrate Bias:

  • Background Tension: The total mass-energy content of the universe establishes a baseline tension in the Substrate.
  • Threshold Behavior: When local accelerations drop below \( a_0 \), the influence of this global tension becomes comparable to or greater than local gravitational effects.

At this threshold, an object’s dynamics transition from being dominated by local mass distributions to being significantly shaped by the global Substrate field. The value \( a_0 \) thus marks the crossover between local and cosmic influence.

4. Newton’s Bucket and Substrate Rotation

The video revisits Newton’s Bucket as a classic argument about absolute versus relative rotation, supporting a Machian interpretation where rotation is defined relative to distant masses.

RST refines this by introducing the Substrate as the immediate reference frame:

  • Local Frame: The bucket and water rotate relative to the local state of the Substrate.
  • Cosmic Anchors: The distant stars define the large-scale configuration of the Substrate field.
  • Curved Surface: The concave water surface visualizes the centrifugal pressure generated as the Substrate resists rotational motion.

This provides a mechanical explanation of Newton’s Bucket without appealing to absolute space, while remaining consistent with Mach’s Principle.

5. Summary of the RST–MOND Synthesis

Concept Video’s Interpretation RST Mechanical Interpretation
Space / Background Machian field / relational structure Reactive Substrate \( S \)
Inertia Interaction with distant masses Substrate Back-Pressure / Drag
Dark Matter Unnecessary or ad hoc fix Replaced by Substrate tension variation
MOND \( a_0 \) Universal acceleration threshold Global Substrate tension bias
Flat Rotation Curves Modification of Newton’s law Reduced Substrate drag at galactic edges

In conclusion, RST supports the video’s central claim that Dark Matter may be an unnecessary, ad hoc addition. By treating the vacuum as a reactive medium whose tension depends on mass distribution, RST explains galactic rotation curves as a direct mechanical consequence of how Substrate tension—and therefore inertial drag—varies from the dense galactic core to the sparse outer regions.

Popular posts from this blog

Conceptual Summary #2: (∂t2​S−c2∇2S+βS3)=σ(x,t)⋅FR​(C[Ψ])

Image
The tests designed to find the Aether—principally the Michelson-Morley experiment (M-M)—would be largely ineffective at detecting the fundamental S field (Substrate) in the Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) framework, though their null results are highly compatible with RST's structure. The reason lies in the distinct conceptual definition and behavior of the two media. The Test: Michelson-Morley and the Aether. The M-M experiment was designed to detect the "aether wind," a predicted change in the speed of light caused by the Earth's motion relative to a stationary, rigid medium—the classical Luminiferous Aether. Classical Aether: A static, absolute reference frame; an elastic, passive, material-like medium that fills space and serves as a carrier for light waves. Predicted Result: Light traveling parallel to Earth's motion through the Aether should be slightly slower than light traveling perpendicular to it. Actual Result (Null Result): No significant differenc...
Read more

Trump has painted a fascinating “economic science fiction” scenario 💥

Image
A sudden $20 trillion influx into U.S. government coffers would be unlike anything in history. This scenario describes an event of unprecedented economic magnitude, with immediate and long‑term effects across the U.S. and global economies. Imagine $20 trillion USD—roughly the size of the entire current U.S. annual GDP—appearing overnight in America’s coffers. The shockwaves would be severe, destabilizing, and unlike anything in history. Let’s break it down clearly, with emphasis on domestic shockwaves, global fallout, and observable indicators. 💥 Scenario Analysis: A $20 Trillion Shock to the U.S. Treasury Imagine $20 trillion USD—roughly the size of the entire current U.S. annual GDP—suddenly appearing in America’s coffers. This unprecedented event would unleash immediate and long-term effects across the U.S. and global economies, driven by inflation, currency collapse, and systemic disruption. Domestic Effects (United States): Hyperinflation: The sudden money suppl...
Read more

THE GOLDEN BALLROOM/BUNKER

Image
Ben Meiselas reports on the shocking admission by Donald Trump’s DOJ in a court case where the DOJ admits to a secret project underneath the ballroom which they claim is needed to protect Donald Trump’s life for “national security purposes.” "You unlock this door with the key of complicity. Beyond it is another dimension — a dimension of betrayal, of indulgence, of fear. You’re moving into a land of both shadow and substance, of politics and paranoia. You’ve just crossed into… the MAGA Zone." "Tonight’s story: A leader sworn to protect his nation makes a bargain with its enemies. The deal? Silence in the face of nuclear annihilation. No retaliation, no defense — only surrender dressed in secrecy. While citizens live unaware, their president builds a palace beneath the earth, a ballroom of gold, of marble and chandeliers, a masquerade hall for billionaires. But behind the gilded doors lies not music and laughter, but a bomb shelter — a sanctuary for the few, pur...
Read more