Comparing SRGs to Magnetic Field Lines

Visualizing Substrate Reaction Geometries (SRGs)

While the Substrate in RST is not magnetic, the following video provides an excellent visual metaphor for how different elements create unique tension patterns in the medium. The shifting magnetic vibration patterns resemble how atomic solitons sculpt the Substrate into distinct Substrate Reaction Geometries (SRGs).

In RST, each element produces a characteristic tension footprint in the Substrate. Although the Substrate is not electromagnetic, the dynamic patterns in this video offer a helpful analogy for:

  • how tension gradients form around atomic solitons
  • how SRG lobes resemble field-like structures
  • how nonlinear interactions create complex geometries
  • how molecules emerge from overlapping reaction patterns

This visualization helps bridge the gap between traditional orbital diagrams and the mechanical, tension-based interpretation introduced in the RST periodic table.

Comparing SRGs to Magnetic Field Lines

Although the Substrate in RST is not electromagnetic, magnetic field-line demonstrations provide an excellent visual analogy for how tension patterns form around atomic solitons. The following video illustrates dynamic field structures that closely resemble the Substrate Reaction Geometries (SRGs) described in the RST periodic table.

How Each Moment in the Video Maps to RST Concepts

  • 0:10 – Expanding rings: Represents how simple atoms (H, He) generate smooth radial SRGs with minimal directional tension gradients.
  • 0:25 – Interference patterns forming: Mirrors how p‑block elements (C, N, O) create directional SRG lobes due to standing-wave interference in the Substrate.
  • 0:40 – Complex overlapping waves: Analogous to transition metals, where multiple SRG layers overlap and produce multi‑directional tension channels.
  • 0:55 – Field compression and expansion: Reflects how electronegativity corresponds to the steepness of tension gradients in the SRG, pulling shared soliton waves inward.
  • 1:10 – Symmetric stabilization: Similar to noble gases, whose SRGs form closed, symmetric shells with minimal external gradients.
  • 1:25 – Chaotic nonlinear regions: Represents heavy f‑block elements where nonlinear substrate response dominates and SRGs become bandwidth‑intensive and multi‑layered.

These visual parallels help readers intuitively grasp how SRGs behave as mechanical tension patterns in the Substrate, even though the underlying physics differs from magnetism.

Diagram Set: SRG Shapes Mapped to Periodic Groups

Below is a conceptual diagram set showing how different classes of elements generate distinct SRG geometries. These are not literal field lines but simplified visual representations of tension patterns in the Substrate.

1. Class I – Simple Radial SRGs (H, He, Li, Be)

      low tension      medium         high tension
           .           . . .              ###
            .        .       .          #######
             .      .   ●     .       ###########
            .        .       .          #######
           .           . . .              ###

Simple spherical wells with minimal directional structure.

2. Class II – Directional SRGs (C, N, O, F, P, S)

        lobe      lobe
          \       /
           \     /
            ●---●
           /     \
        lobe     lobe

Distinct tension lobes corresponding to preferred bonding directions.

3. Class III – Lattice SRGs (Metals)

● = ● = ● = ●
=   =   =   =
● = ● = ● = ●

Overlapping SRGs forming delocalized tension networks.

4. Class IV – Closed Shell SRGs (Noble Gases)

      o o o o o o o o
    o                 o
   o        ●         o
    o                 o
      o o o o o o o o

Symmetric, self-contained SRGs with minimal external gradients.

5. Class V – Nonlinear Multi‑Layer SRGs (Lanthanides, Actinides)

   #######====#######
  ##     #####     ##
 ##  ●  #######  ●  ##
  ##     #####     ##
   #######====#######

Deep, bandwidth-intensive SRGs with multiple nonlinear layers.

Together, these diagrams and the magnetic‑field visualization help bridge the gap between traditional orbital diagrams and the mechanical tension‑geometry model introduced by RST. They provide readers with intuitive, dynamic imagery that supports the idea of atoms as soliton-driven tension structures in a reactive Substrate.

Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) — Complete Glossary

This glossary collects all major terms used across the RST series so far. Each entry is written for clarity and consistency, providing readers with a reference point as the theory expands into substrate mechanics, soliton physics, tension geometry, and the RST periodic table.

A

Atomic Soliton
A stable, self-reinforcing configuration of Substrate displacement representing an atom’s nucleus and electron-like standing waves. The atomic soliton is the source of an element’s Substrate Reaction Geometry (SRG).

B

Bandwidth (Substrate Reaction Bandwidth)
The finite capacity of the Substrate to update, react, and maintain soliton structures. High tension or complex SRGs consume more bandwidth, leading to effects such as time dilation and nonlinear behavior.

C

Curvature Response (FR(C[Ψ]))
A term in the RST master equation describing how soliton curvature influences local substrate tension. It encodes the internal geometry of matter waves.

D

Directional SRG
An SRG with distinct tension lobes or preferred bonding directions, typical of p‑block elements such as carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen.

E

Emergent Tension Geometry
The combined tension pattern formed when multiple SRGs overlap to create a molecule. Determines molecular shape, polarity, and stability.

F

Finite Reaction Speed (c)
The maximum speed at which the Substrate can propagate tension changes. Analogous to the speed of light but interpreted mechanically.

G

Gravity (RST Interpretation)
A refraction effect caused by gradients in substrate tension and density. Waves curve toward regions of slower substrate reaction speed, producing gravitational acceleration.

I

Interference Shell
A standing-wave pattern in the Substrate corresponding to electron-like orbitals. These shells shape the outer structure of an atom’s SRG.

L

Lattice SRG
A delocalized tension network formed by overlapping SRGs in metals. Responsible for conductivity, malleability, and metallic bonding.

M

Molecular SRG
The global Substrate Reaction Geometry formed when atoms bond. Represents the nonlinear superposition of atomic SRGs.

Master Equation (RST)
The core dynamical equation governing Substrate displacement: 

∂²ₜ S − c² ∇²S + β S³ = σ(x,t) · F_R(C[Ψ])

It describes how solitons, tension, and nonlinear substrate response interact.

N

Nonlinear Response (β S³)
A cubic term in the RST equation representing the Substrate’s nonlinear restoring force. Dominant in strong-field regions and heavy elements.

Noble Gas SRG
A closed, symmetric SRG with minimal external tension gradients. Explains noble gas inertness in RST.

P

Periodic Tension Classes
RST’s classification of elements based on SRG geometry:

  • Class I — Simple radial SRGs
  • Class II — Directional SRGs
  • Class III — Lattice SRGs
  • Class IV — Closed-shell SRGs
  • Class V — Nonlinear multi-layer SRGs

Poisson-like Limit
The weak-field approximation of the RST equation where tension gradients behave like gravitational or electrostatic potentials.

S

Substrate
The reactive medium underlying all physical phenomena in RST. Supports tension, solitons, wave propagation, and nonlinear interactions.

Substrate Density
Local compression or rarefaction of the Substrate. Higher density reduces reaction speed and increases effective refractive index.

Substrate Reaction Geometry (SRG)
The unique tension pattern an atom imprints on the Substrate. Defines its bonding behavior, periodic classification, and emergent properties.

Substrate Tension (T⃗)
A vector field defined as T⃗ = μ c² ∇S. Represents the mechanical tension generated by gradients in Substrate displacement.

T

Tension Gradient
Spatial variation in substrate tension. Drives refraction, bonding, and gravitational-like behavior.

Time Dilation (RST Interpretation)
A reduction in local substrate reaction bandwidth near high-tension regions, slowing all processes dependent on substrate updates.

W

Weak-Field Limit
The regime where nonlinear terms are small and SRGs behave like classical potential fields. Useful for approximating gravitational and chemical behavior.

This glossary will expand as RST evolves into new domains such as cosmology, materials science, and nonlinear soliton chemistry.

Popular posts from this blog

THE GOLDEN BALLROOM/BUNKER

Image
Ben Meiselas reports on the shocking admission by Donald Trump’s DOJ in a court case where the DOJ admits to a secret project underneath the ballroom which they claim is needed to protect Donald Trump’s life for “national security purposes.” "You unlock this door with the key of complicity. Beyond it is another dimension — a dimension of betrayal, of indulgence, of fear. You’re moving into a land of both shadow and substance, of politics and paranoia. You’ve just crossed into… the MAGA Zone." "Tonight’s story: A leader sworn to protect his nation makes a bargain with its enemies. The deal? Silence in the face of nuclear annihilation. No retaliation, no defense — only surrender dressed in secrecy. While citizens live unaware, their president builds a palace beneath the earth, a ballroom of gold, of marble and chandeliers, a masquerade hall for billionaires. But behind the gilded doors lies not music and laughter, but a bomb shelter — a sanctuary for the few, pur...
Read more

Conceptual Summary #2: (∂t2​S−c2∇2S+βS3)=σ(x,t)⋅FR​(C[Ψ])

Image
The tests designed to find the Aether—principally the Michelson-Morley experiment (M-M)—would be largely ineffective at detecting the fundamental S field (Substrate) in the Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) framework, though their null results are highly compatible with RST's structure. The reason lies in the distinct conceptual definition and behavior of the two media. The Test: Michelson-Morley and the Aether. The M-M experiment was designed to detect the "aether wind," a predicted change in the speed of light caused by the Earth's motion relative to a stationary, rigid medium—the classical Luminiferous Aether. Classical Aether: A static, absolute reference frame; an elastic, passive, material-like medium that fills space and serves as a carrier for light waves. Predicted Result: Light traveling parallel to Earth's motion through the Aether should be slightly slower than light traveling perpendicular to it. Actual Result (Null Result): No significant differenc...
Read more

Trump has painted a fascinating “economic science fiction” scenario 💥

Image
A sudden $20 trillion influx into U.S. government coffers would be unlike anything in history. This scenario describes an event of unprecedented economic magnitude, with immediate and long‑term effects across the U.S. and global economies. Imagine $20 trillion USD—roughly the size of the entire current U.S. annual GDP—appearing overnight in America’s coffers. The shockwaves would be severe, destabilizing, and unlike anything in history. Let’s break it down clearly, with emphasis on domestic shockwaves, global fallout, and observable indicators. 💥 Scenario Analysis: A $20 Trillion Shock to the U.S. Treasury Imagine $20 trillion USD—roughly the size of the entire current U.S. annual GDP—suddenly appearing in America’s coffers. This unprecedented event would unleash immediate and long-term effects across the U.S. and global economies, driven by inflation, currency collapse, and systemic disruption. Domestic Effects (United States): Hyperinflation: The sudden money suppl...
Read more