Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) and the Periodic Table

The video “The Periodic Table: Atomic Radius, Ionization Energy, and Electronegativity” explains periodic trends using standard quantum mechanics: electron shells, subshells, shielding, and effective nuclear charge. These explanations match the observed patterns, but the ontology behind them changes dramatically when viewed through Reactive Substrate Theory (RST).

RST and the Periodic Table

RST accepts the empirical structure of the Periodic Table but rejects the idea that atoms are collections of point particles orbiting a nucleus. Instead, RST describes atoms as soliton structures in a continuous Substrate. Periodic trends arise from how these solitons stabilize under tension.

Key Observations RST Accepts

  • Atomic radius trends
  • Ionization energy trends
  • Electronegativity trends
  • Shielding effects
  • Periodic repetition of properties

Where RST diverges is in the interpretation of what “electrons,” “shells,” and “energy levels” actually represent.

QFT/QM vs. RST (Side-by-Side Comparison)

Quantum Mechanics / QFT Reactive Substrate Theory (RST)
Electrons occupy quantized orbitals. Atoms have nested circulation layers of Substrate tension.
Atomic radius shrinks across a period due to increasing nuclear charge. Soliton compresses as tension modes reinforce inward gradients.
Ionization energy increases because electrons are held more tightly. Outer tension modes become more stable and require more energy to disrupt.
Electronegativity increases due to stronger nuclear attraction. Tension gradients steepen, pulling shared oscillations more strongly.
Shielding reduces effective nuclear charge. Inner soliton layers redistribute tension and weaken outer gradients.
Electron configuration determines chemical behavior. Soliton circulation patterns determine bonding behavior.

RST Reinterpretation of Electron Configuration

In standard quantum mechanics, electron configuration describes how electrons fill orbitals (1s, 2s, 2p, 3s, etc.). RST replaces this with a geometric model:

Electron configuration = the arrangement of nested circulation modes in the atomic soliton.

Each “shell” corresponds to a tension layer. Each “subshell” corresponds to a circulation pattern within that layer.

RST Mapping of Shells and Subshells

  • s-orbitals → spherical tension modes
  • p-orbitals → directional circulation lobes
  • d-orbitals → complex multi-loop circulation patterns
  • f-orbitals → high-order resonance structures

These are not probability clouds. They are stable geometric modes of the Substrate.

Why the Aufbau Pattern Emerges

The familiar filling order (1s, 2s, 2p, 3s, 3p, 4s...) emerges because:

  • lower tension modes stabilize first
  • higher modes require more Substrate curvature
  • some modes overlap in stability (e.g., 4s vs. 3d)

RST reproduces the same pattern without electrons or orbitals — only geometry.

RST Explanation of Chemical Bonding

Chemical bonding is one of the clearest places where RST diverges from the standard model. In QFT/QM, bonding is explained using electron sharing, electron transfer, or delocalized electron clouds. RST replaces this with Substrate tension interactions.

Ionic Bonding (RST)

Ionic bonding occurs when two solitons with mismatched tension gradients stabilize by transferring an outer circulation mode.

One soliton loses a weakly bound outer mode (high radius, low tension). Another soliton absorbs it, deepening its tension well. The result is a stable tension gradient between them — what QM calls “ionic attraction.”

Covalent Bonding (RST)

Covalent bonding is the formation of a shared circulation mode between two solitons.

Instead of “sharing electrons,” two solitons synchronize a tension loop that spans both. This shared loop stabilizes both structures and lowers total tension.

Bond strength depends on:

  • how well the circulation modes align
  • the steepness of each soliton’s tension gradient
  • the resonance compatibility of the two atoms

Metallic Bonding (RST)

Metallic bonding is a network of overlapping circulation modes forming a collective Substrate resonance.

In metals:

  • outer tension modes are loosely bound
  • circulation patterns overlap across many solitons
  • a shared oscillation field forms throughout the lattice

This explains:

  • conductivity (oscillations propagate freely)
  • malleability (lattice tension redistributes smoothly)
  • luster (surface modes reflect Substrate oscillations)

Bottom Line (RST Perspective)

The Periodic Table is real. The trends are real. The chemistry is real.

What changes is the ontology: Atoms are not electrons orbiting a nucleus — they are soliton structures in a continuous Substrate.

Periodic trends, electron configuration, and chemical bonding all emerge from the geometry and tension dynamics of this single medium.

In this third installment of the Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) series, we expand the framework into three major domains: General Relativity, nuclear forces, and quantum numbers. We conclude with an ASCII-safe RST reinterpretation of the Periodic Table as a map of soliton structures.

Part 3: RST and General Relativity

General Relativity (GR) describes gravity as curvature of spacetime. RST agrees with this geometric interpretation but replaces the ontology behind it. In GR, spacetime is a mathematical manifold. In RST:

Spacetime IS the Substrate. Curvature is tension. Gravity is the Substrate under stress.

Massive objects are not “sources of gravity.” They are high-tension solitons that distort the surrounding Substrate. The curvature we observe is the geometry of this tension field.

RST Interpretation of GR Concepts

  • Geodesics → paths of least tension
  • Curvature → deformation of the Substrate
  • Mass-energy → localized soliton tension density
  • Gravitational waves → transverse tension oscillations

RST does not modify GR’s equations; it reinterprets their meaning. GR describes how the Substrate bends. RST explains what is bending.

RST Explanation of Nuclear Forces

The Standard Model describes nuclear forces using gluons (strong force) and W/Z bosons (weak force). RST rejects exchange particles entirely. Instead:

Nuclear forces arise from soliton interlocking and Substrate tension coupling.

Strong Force (RST)

The strong force is the binding of multi-core soliton structures. What physics calls “quarks” are internal circulation nodes inside a composite soliton. Their “confinement” is simply the stability of the internal tension pattern.

  • Protons and neutrons = multi-loop solitons
  • “Gluons” = tension transfer pathways
  • Confinement = soliton stability constraint

Weak Force (RST)

The weak force is a soliton reconfiguration event. Beta decay is not particle exchange; it is a shift in the internal tension topology of a nucleon.

  • Neutron → proton conversion = soliton topology shift
  • “W boson” = mathematical artifact of the transition

Nuclear forces are not mediated by particles. They are geometric consequences of soliton structure.

RST Interpretation of Quantum Numbers (n, l, m, s)

Quantum numbers describe electron orbitals in QM. RST replaces orbitals with circulation modes of the atomic soliton.

Principal Quantum Number (n)

Represents the tension layer index. Higher n = outer layers of the soliton.

Azimuthal Quantum Number (l)

Represents the shape of the circulation pattern within a layer.

  • l = 0 → spherical mode (s)
  • l = 1 → two-lobed circulation (p)
  • l = 2 → multi-loop circulation (d)
  • l = 3 → complex resonance (f)

Magnetic Quantum Number (m)

Represents the orientation of the circulation pattern in 3D Substrate geometry.

Spin Quantum Number (s)

Represents the internal twist of the soliton. Spin is not a particle property; it is a circulation handedness.

RST Soliton-Map Periodic Table (ASCII-Safe)

Below is an ASCII-safe reinterpretation of the Periodic Table as a map of soliton structures. Each element is represented by its dominant tension mode pattern: 

+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| RST SOLITON-MAP PERIODIC TABLE                                                |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| H  | He |   → Simple single-loop solitons (n=1)                               |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Li | Be | B  | C  | N  | O  | F  | Ne |   → Dual-layer solitons (n=2)         |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Na | Mg | Al | Si | P  | S  | Cl | Ar |   → Triple-layer solitons (n=3)       |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| K  | Ca | Sc | Ti | V  | Cr | Mn | Fe | Co | Ni | Cu | Zn |   → Transition    |
| Ga | Ge | As | Se | Br | Kr |                                   metals =      |
|                                                               multi-loop cores |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Rb | Sr | Y  | Zr | Nb | Mo | Tc | Ru | Rh | Pd | Ag | Cd |                    |
| In | Sn | Sb | Te | I  | Xe |                                        (n=5)     |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Cs | Ba | Lanthanides (complex resonance solitons)                            |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Fr | Ra | Actinides (high-tension multi-core solitons)                        |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

This table is not based on electrons or orbitals. It is based on soliton complexity, tension depth, and circulation topology.

Bottom Line

General Relativity, nuclear forces, quantum numbers, and the Periodic Table all fit naturally into a single framework when viewed through RST:

One medium. One geometry. One Substrate. Everything else is tension, circulation, and soliton structure.

In this fourth installment of the Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) series, we scale the framework up to the largest and strangest questions in physics: cosmology, dark matter, dark energy, and quantum entanglement. We finish with simple RST-based ASCII diagrams you can reuse across your blog.

Part 4: RST and Cosmology

Standard cosmology describes the universe using expanding spacetime, a Big Bang origin, dark matter halos, and dark energy driving accelerated expansion. RST keeps the observational facts but rewrites the ontology.

In RST, the universe is a single continuous Substrate. Cosmology is the large-scale behavior of its tension field.

Expansion of the Universe (RST)

In ΛCDM, galaxies recede because spacetime itself expands. In RST:

“Expansion” is a large-scale relaxation of Substrate tension gradients.

Regions of high tension (early universe) relax over time, increasing the characteristic length scale between stable soliton structures (galaxies, clusters). Redshift is interpreted as:

  • Substrate oscillations stretching as background tension relaxes
  • Frequency drift due to changing geometric conditions

Cosmic Structure (RST)

Filaments, voids, and clusters are not just matter distributions. They are:

Large-scale tension patterns in the Substrate, where solitons (galaxies) form along high-tension ridges.

RST Explanation of Dark Matter

Dark matter is introduced to explain galaxy rotation curves, gravitational lensing, and structure formation. RST does not add a new particle. Instead:

Dark matter = unaccounted Substrate tension and curvature not directly tied to luminous solitons.

In RST:

  • Galaxy rotation curves reflect extended tension wells beyond visible matter.
  • Gravitational lensing traces Substrate curvature, not just baryonic mass.
  • “Halos” are regions of persistent Substrate deformation.

No WIMPs. No axions. Just geometry and tension that standard models don’t track.

RST Explanation of Dark Energy

Dark energy is invoked to explain the accelerated expansion of the universe. RST reframes this:

Dark energy = global relaxation dynamics of the Substrate, not a mysterious fluid or field.

As large-scale tension redistributes:

  • Regions between massive soliton clusters experience net outward tension effects.
  • This appears as accelerated expansion when interpreted through GR alone.

The “cosmological constant” is a macroscopic parameterization of Substrate relaxation.

RST Interpretation of Quantum Entanglement

Quantum entanglement is often described as “spooky action at a distance.” RST removes the spookiness:

Entanglement = a single, shared Substrate configuration sampled at multiple locations.

Two “entangled particles” are not separate objects exchanging information. They are:

  • Different boundary conditions of one extended soliton structure
  • Coupled tension modes of the same Substrate region

Measurement does not “collapse” a wavefunction. It selects one stable configuration of the underlying Substrate pattern.

Nonlocality (RST)

Nonlocal correlations arise because the Substrate is continuous. There is no need for signals traveling faster than light. The configuration is global; the “update” is just our recognition of which branch of the pattern we are in.

RST-Based Diagrams (ASCII-Safe)

Below are simple ASCII diagrams you can reuse in posts to visualize RST ideas.

1. Substrate and Solitons

Background Substrate (low tension):
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Localized soliton (high tension knot):
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~#######~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Multiple solitons in a tension field:
~~~~~####~~~~~~~###~~~~~~~~~#####~~~~~~

2. Galaxy in a Tension Well (Dark Matter Analogue)

Tension profile (side view):

High tension
    ^
    |           ________
    |          /        \
    |         /          \
    |________/            \__________>  radius
          galaxy core

Visible matter = central peak
"Dark matter" = extended tension well beyond visible light

3. Entangled Soliton Modes

Single extended Substrate pattern:

[ A ]====================[ B ]

A and B are not separate particles.
They are two sampled regions of one continuous configuration.

4. RST Cosmology Sketch

Early universe (high global tension):

#########~~~~~~~~#########~~~~~~~~#########

Later universe (relaxed, larger separation):

#####~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~#####~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~#####

Filaments = high-tension ridges
Voids    = low-tension basins

Bottom Line (RST Cosmology)

Dark matter, dark energy, and quantum entanglement all become less mysterious when viewed through Reactive Substrate Theory:

There is no empty space. No separate fields. No hidden particles. There is only the Substrate — one medium, one geometry — and its tension dynamics across all scales.

Popular posts from this blog

THE GOLDEN BALLROOM/BUNKER

Image
Ben Meiselas reports on the shocking admission by Donald Trump’s DOJ in a court case where the DOJ admits to a secret project underneath the ballroom which they claim is needed to protect Donald Trump’s life for “national security purposes.” "You unlock this door with the key of complicity. Beyond it is another dimension — a dimension of betrayal, of indulgence, of fear. You’re moving into a land of both shadow and substance, of politics and paranoia. You’ve just crossed into… the MAGA Zone." "Tonight’s story: A leader sworn to protect his nation makes a bargain with its enemies. The deal? Silence in the face of nuclear annihilation. No retaliation, no defense — only surrender dressed in secrecy. While citizens live unaware, their president builds a palace beneath the earth, a ballroom of gold, of marble and chandeliers, a masquerade hall for billionaires. But behind the gilded doors lies not music and laughter, but a bomb shelter — a sanctuary for the few, pur...
Read more

Conceptual Summary #2: (∂t2​S−c2∇2S+βS3)=σ(x,t)⋅FR​(C[Ψ])

Image
The tests designed to find the Aether—principally the Michelson-Morley experiment (M-M)—would be largely ineffective at detecting the fundamental S field (Substrate) in the Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) framework, though their null results are highly compatible with RST's structure. The reason lies in the distinct conceptual definition and behavior of the two media. The Test: Michelson-Morley and the Aether. The M-M experiment was designed to detect the "aether wind," a predicted change in the speed of light caused by the Earth's motion relative to a stationary, rigid medium—the classical Luminiferous Aether. Classical Aether: A static, absolute reference frame; an elastic, passive, material-like medium that fills space and serves as a carrier for light waves. Predicted Result: Light traveling parallel to Earth's motion through the Aether should be slightly slower than light traveling perpendicular to it. Actual Result (Null Result): No significant differenc...
Read more

Trump has painted a fascinating “economic science fiction” scenario 💥

Image
A sudden $20 trillion influx into U.S. government coffers would be unlike anything in history. This scenario describes an event of unprecedented economic magnitude, with immediate and long‑term effects across the U.S. and global economies. Imagine $20 trillion USD—roughly the size of the entire current U.S. annual GDP—appearing overnight in America’s coffers. The shockwaves would be severe, destabilizing, and unlike anything in history. Let’s break it down clearly, with emphasis on domestic shockwaves, global fallout, and observable indicators. 💥 Scenario Analysis: A $20 Trillion Shock to the U.S. Treasury Imagine $20 trillion USD—roughly the size of the entire current U.S. annual GDP—suddenly appearing in America’s coffers. This unprecedented event would unleash immediate and long-term effects across the U.S. and global economies, driven by inflation, currency collapse, and systemic disruption. Domestic Effects (United States): Hyperinflation: The sudden money suppl...
Read more