Conceptual Analogies for Reactive Substrate Theory (RST)
Many researchers approach general relativity and quantum mechanics by first mastering the mathematics and then interpreting the physics. My path was the reverse: driven by a strongly visual and pattern-based cognitive style, I focused for decades on understanding where the existing theories succeed, where they strain, and where their assumptions may be doing hidden work. Mathematics enters as a language for expressing an already-formed physical picture, not as the generator of the picture itself.“At this stage, the mathematics is no longer just a translation layer. The evolving equations now feed back into my understanding and constrain it — though they don’t fully replace the underlying physical intuition that generated them.”
Reactive Substrate Theory (RST)
A Unified Field Perspective on Quantum Phenomena, Gravity, and Cosmology
RST is presented as an evolving framework: conceptually developed first, with mathematical formalism refined iteratively and intended for external simulation and testing.
The Core Premise: Spacetime is not a fundamental arena, but the macroscopic, coarse-grained behavior of a single, nonlinear physical medium referred to as the Substrate.
Conceptual Analogies for Reactive Substrate Theory (RST)
The following metaphors are not presented as proofs, but as intuition guides. Each maps directly onto the current mathematical structure of RST and is intended to clarify what the equations are doing rather than replace formal derivations.
-
The Substrate as a Pre-Stressed Medium
Spacetime behaves like a tensioned elastic medium rather than an empty container. Curvature, gravity, and time dilation arise from gradients in this tension, not from geometry imposed on nothing. -
Time as a Clock Spring, Not a Coordinate
Proper time is a local rate set by the substrate state. Regions accumulate different amounts of physical time depending on substrate tension, explaining early structure formation without modifying gravity. -
The RST Equation as a Master Circuit
The substrate field equation functions like a governing circuit law: nonlinear feedback, resonance, and saturation determine which modes stabilize, grow, or decay. -
Particles as Standing Notes in a Resonant Instrument
Solitons are not inserted objects but stable resonance modes the substrate can sustain. Mass, quantization, and decay correspond to tuning, boundary conditions, and detuning. -
Electromagnetism as Phase Hydrodynamics
Maxwell’s equations emerge from the phase flow of a coherent field. Charge, current, and magnetism arise as organized phase structures, similar to vortices in superfluids. -
Dark Matter as a Terrain Misinterpretation
Rotation curves and lensing effects arise from substrate gradients and time-rate variation, not from unseen matter. The anomaly reflects misreading the medium, not missing mass. -
The Universe as Weather, Not Clockwork
Large-scale structure forms through instabilities, turbulence, and resonance in the substrate, much like coherent structures emerging in fluid dynamics. -
RST as a Simulation-First Theory
RST is comparable to Navier–Stokes prior to modern CFD: the equation exists, but its behavior across regimes must be explored numerically to reveal stable structures, transitions, and emergent phenomena.
Summary: Reactive Substrate Theory treats modern physics as an assembly problem. The equations and observations already exist; RST proposes that many of them describe different limits of a single nonlinear medium. These analogies are intended to guide intuition while inviting formal simulation, analysis, and experimental testing.
Reactive Substrate Theory (RST): A Unified Field Perspective on Quantum Phenomena, Gravity, and Cosmology
