Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) v1.0 – Formal Specification

Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) v1.0 – Formal Specification

A Unified Resonance–Substrate Field Model

Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) models reality as a nonlinear, tension-bearing Substrate field coupled to structured Resonance fields. Stable, localized configurations of these fields correspond to “particles” (matter).


1. Fields and Domains

  • Spacetime domain: x ∈ ℝ³, t ∈ ℝ.
  • Substrate field: S(x,t) ∈ ℝ.
  • Resonance field: Ψ(x,t) ∈ ℂ (or ℝ in the simplest scalar version).

2. Core Field Equations (Model A)


Substrate equation:
  ∂²S/∂t² - c² ∇²S + β S³ = α σ(x,t) |Ψ|²

Resonance equation:
  ∂²Ψ/∂t² - v² ∇²Ψ + μ Ψ + λ |Ψ|² Ψ = κ S Ψ
  • c: Substrate wave speed (tension propagation).
  • v: Resonance wave speed.
  • μ: Linear “mass-like” parameter for Ψ.
  • λ > 0: Resonance self-repulsion (defocusing nonlinearity).
  • β > 0: Substrate stiffening (saturating nonlinearity).
  • κ > 0: Substrate → Resonance coupling strength.
  • α > 0: Resonance → Substrate source strength.
  • σ(x,t): Source distribution (localizes coupling, e.g. around a lump).

Interpretation: |Ψ|² deforms S; the deformed S feeds back on Ψ. Nonlinearities (β S³, λ |Ψ|² Ψ) and this feedback loop allow stable, localized structures.


3. Effective Nonlinearity and Tensegrity Condition

For static, localized configurations, the Substrate response can be approximated as:


S₀(x) ≈ η_eff(|Ψ|²) |Ψ(x)|²

This induces an effective cubic term in the Ψ equation:


b_eff = λ - κ η_eff(|Ψ|²)

Localization condition (tensegrity balance):


b_eff < 0  ⇒  κ η_eff > λ

Substrate focusing (κ η_eff) must overpower bare self-repulsion (λ) for a stable lump to exist. The β S³ term makes η_eff decrease with amplitude, preventing collapse and favoring finite-size structures.


4. Static, Spherically Symmetric Lump (3D Particle Model)

Assume a single, spherically symmetric, time-harmonic lump:


Ψ(x,t) = ψ(r) e^{-i ω t}
S(x,t) = S₀(r)
r = |x|

The 3D Laplacian in spherical symmetry:


∇²f = f''(r) + (2/r) f'(r)

4.1 Static Resonance Equation (3D)


- v² (ψ'' + (2/r) ψ') + (μ - ω²) ψ + λ ψ³ - κ S₀(r) ψ = 0
Define:

a = μ - ω²
b_eff = λ - κ η_eff
Then, in effective form:

- v² (ψ'' + (2/r) ψ') + a ψ + b_eff ψ³ = 0
  • Bound-state condition: a = μ - ω² > 0.
  • Net focusing: b_eff < 0 ⇒ κ η_eff > λ.

4.2 Static Substrate Equation (3D)


- c² (S₀'' + (2/r) S₀') + β S₀³ = α σ(r) ψ²

For moderate amplitudes, S₀(r) ≈ η_eff(ψ²) ψ²(r), with η_eff decreasing as ψ² grows due to β S₀³.

4.3 Boundary Conditions


At r = 0:
  ψ'(0) = 0
  S₀'(0) = 0

As r → ∞:
  ψ(r) → 0
  S₀(r) → 0 (or a constant background)

5. 1D Soliton Check (Concept Validation)

In 1D, with ψ(x) = A sech(x/L), the effective equation


- v² ψ'' + a ψ + b_eff ψ³ = 0

is solved exactly if:


a = v² / L²
b_eff = -2 v² / (A² L²)

which implies:


μ - ω² = v² / L² > 0
κ η > λ
A² = 2 v² / [ (κ η - λ) L² ]

This confirms the tensegrity condition and shows that amplitude and size are linked, not arbitrary.


6. Energy of the Lump (Resonance Part)

Static resonance energy density:


E_ψ = ∫ [ (v²/2) (ψ')² + (a/2) ψ² + (b_eff/4) ψ⁴ ] dx

For the 1D sech solution:


E_ψ = 4 v⁴ / [ 3 (κ η - λ) L³ ]

This behaves like a mass: finite, positive, and increasing as the lump narrows. Adding Substrate energy will select a preferred radius.


3D Numerical Shooting Method Setup (RST v1.0)

To construct explicit 3D RST particles, we solve the coupled radial ODEs for ψ(r) and S₀(r) using a shooting method.


1. Radial ODE System

Unknowns: ψ(r), S₀(r). Parameters: c, v, μ, λ, β, κ, α, ω.


Resonance:
  - v² (ψ'' + (2/r) ψ') + (μ - ω²) ψ + λ ψ³ - κ S₀(r) ψ = 0

Substrate:
  - c² (S₀'' + (2/r) S₀') + β S₀³ = α σ(r) ψ²

Choose σ(r) = 1 in the core region (or simply σ(r) = 1 for a first pass).


2. Initial Conditions at r = 0

Regularity at the origin implies:


ψ(0)  = A      (shooting parameter)
ψ'(0) = 0

S₀(0)  = S_c   (central Substrate value, can be fixed or also shot)
S₀'(0) = 0

Typically, you fix S_c = 0 or a small value and treat A (and possibly ω) as shooting parameters.


3. Shooting Strategy

  1. Choose parameters: c, v, μ, λ, β, κ, α, and a trial ω.
  2. Pick initial guesses: A (and optionally S_c).
  3. Integrate outward: Numerically integrate the ODE system from r = 0 to r = R_max using the initial conditions.
  4. Check asymptotics:
    • Does ψ(r) → 0 as r → R_max?
    • Does S₀(r) → 0 (or a constant) as r → R_max?
  5. Adjust A (and/or ω): Use a root-finding method (e.g. bisection, secant) on A (and/or ω) to enforce ψ(R_max) ≈ 0 and S₀(R_max) ≈ 0.
  6. Converged solution: When boundary conditions at large r are satisfied within tolerance, you have a candidate RST particle profile.

4. Energy Calculation in 3D

Once ψ(r) and S₀(r) are known, compute the total energy:


E_total = 4π ∫₀^∞ [
  (v²/2) (ψ')²
  + (a/2) ψ²
  + (b_eff/4) ψ⁴
  + (c²/2) (S₀')²
  + (β/4) S₀⁴
] r² dr

This E_total is the mass-like energy of the RST particle. Varying parameters and looking for minima in E_total will reveal preferred sizes and stability properties.


5. Status and Outlook

  • RST v1.0: A fully specified nonlinear field theory with explicit equations and a clear stability mechanism (tensegrity balance).
  • 3D soliton viability: The 3D equations fall into a known class that supports spherically symmetric solitons under the derived conditions.
  • Next concrete step: Implement the radial ODE system and shooting method numerically to obtain the first explicit RST particle profiles.

Popular posts from this blog

THE GOLDEN BALLROOM/BUNKER

Conceptual Summary #2: (∂t2​S−c2∇2S+βS3)=σ(x,t)⋅FR​(C[Ψ])

ICE PROUDLY ANNOUNCES NEW “ELITE” TASK FORCE COMMANDER JEREMY DEWITTE