RST vs. Dimensions: Support and Contradiction

📐 RST vs. Dimensions: Support and Contradiction

The video “How Dimensions Actually Work (You Probably Didn’t Know)” provides a comprehensive overview of dimensions, from Euclid’s 0D point to Minkowski spacetime, functional spaces, and extra dimensions in String Theory. While it does not mention Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) directly, its content offers a backdrop of established physics and mathematics against which RST positions itself, resulting in both conceptual support and inherent contradiction.

🟢 Arguments Supporting / Aligning with RST

  • High‑Dimensional Abstract Spaces:
    Video: Modern physics uses infinite‑dimensional function spaces (Hilbert/Banach) [08:32]; String Theory posits 10–11 dimensions compactified into Calabi–Yau manifolds [14:10].
    RST: Supports the idea that fundamental reality is abstract and high‑dimensional. Our familiar 3D space and 1D time are simplified projections perceived by consciousness (C[Ψ]). The Σ field could inhabit a space analogous to Hilbert or higher‑dimensional manifolds.
  • Gravity as Warped Geometry:
    Video: General Relativity describes gravity as curvature of spacetime generated by mass/energy (Riemannian manifold) [06:54].
    RST: Agrees gravity is geometric, but replaces passive spacetime curvature with active, elastic tension in the Σ field. Mass (Σ soliton) is the source of strain dictating geometry.

🔴 Arguments Critiquing / Contradicting RST

  • Rigorous, Independent Definition of Dimensions:
    Video: Dimensions traced from Euclid’s 0D point to 3D space, built with precise algebraic definitions [00:09–04:42].
    RST: Claims 3D space is not fundamental. The historical and mathematical consistency of Euclidean and Minkowski geometries undermines RST’s assertion, suggesting they are fundamental rather than emergent.
  • Spacetime as a Causal Structure:
    Video: 4D spacetime defines causal structure (light cone), leading to verified phenomena like time dilation [05:25, 06:39].
    RST: Positions spacetime as emergent. Yet its causal properties are empirically verified, directly challenging RST’s claim that spacetime is secondary.
  • The Point Particle Model:
    Video: Physics relies on the point particle model (0D) to formulate precise laws like F = ma [00:41].
    RST: Defines matter as Σ solitons (extended knots of tension). The continued utility of point particle models contradicts RST’s requirement that matter must be extended field configurations.

📌 Takeaway

The video highlights the depth and rigor of dimensional frameworks in physics and mathematics. RST finds conceptual support in high‑dimensional abstractions and geometric interpretations of gravity, but faces strong contradiction from the robustness of Euclidean/Minkowski definitions, the causal structure of spacetime, and the enduring precision of point particle models.

Popular posts from this blog

Conceptual Summary #2: (∂t2​S−c2∇2S+βS3)=σ(x,t)⋅FR​(C[Ψ])

Image
The tests designed to find the Aether—principally the Michelson-Morley experiment (M-M)—would be largely ineffective at detecting the fundamental S field (Substrate) in the Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) framework, though their null results are highly compatible with RST's structure. The reason lies in the distinct conceptual definition and behavior of the two media. The Test: Michelson-Morley and the Aether. The M-M experiment was designed to detect the "aether wind," a predicted change in the speed of light caused by the Earth's motion relative to a stationary, rigid medium—the classical Luminiferous Aether. Classical Aether: A static, absolute reference frame; an elastic, passive, material-like medium that fills space and serves as a carrier for light waves. Predicted Result: Light traveling parallel to Earth's motion through the Aether should be slightly slower than light traveling perpendicular to it. Actual Result (Null Result): No significant differenc...
Read more

Trump has painted a fascinating “economic science fiction” scenario 💥

Image
A sudden $20 trillion influx into U.S. government coffers would be unlike anything in history. This scenario describes an event of unprecedented economic magnitude, with immediate and long‑term effects across the U.S. and global economies. Imagine $20 trillion USD—roughly the size of the entire current U.S. annual GDP—appearing overnight in America’s coffers. The shockwaves would be severe, destabilizing, and unlike anything in history. Let’s break it down clearly, with emphasis on domestic shockwaves, global fallout, and observable indicators. 💥 Scenario Analysis: A $20 Trillion Shock to the U.S. Treasury Imagine $20 trillion USD—roughly the size of the entire current U.S. annual GDP—suddenly appearing in America’s coffers. This unprecedented event would unleash immediate and long-term effects across the U.S. and global economies, driven by inflation, currency collapse, and systemic disruption. Domestic Effects (United States): Hyperinflation: The sudden money suppl...
Read more

THE GOLDEN BALLROOM/BUNKER

Image
Ben Meiselas reports on the shocking admission by Donald Trump’s DOJ in a court case where the DOJ admits to a secret project underneath the ballroom which they claim is needed to protect Donald Trump’s life for “national security purposes.” "You unlock this door with the key of complicity. Beyond it is another dimension — a dimension of betrayal, of indulgence, of fear. You’re moving into a land of both shadow and substance, of politics and paranoia. You’ve just crossed into… the MAGA Zone." "Tonight’s story: A leader sworn to protect his nation makes a bargain with its enemies. The deal? Silence in the face of nuclear annihilation. No retaliation, no defense — only surrender dressed in secrecy. While citizens live unaware, their president builds a palace beneath the earth, a ballroom of gold, of marble and chandeliers, a masquerade hall for billionaires. But behind the gilded doors lies not music and laughter, but a bomb shelter — a sanctuary for the few, pur...
Read more