Stated Goals vs. Policy Outcomes: Trump’s Economy

💥 Scenario Analysis: Trump’s Claimed Economic “A ++++++++/Miracle” vs. Pre‑War Germany

Donald Trump graded his economy “A ++++++++,” presenting it as a miracle. Pre‑war Germany under Hitler also claimed an economic miracle. While both invoked national pride, the structures and failure modes were vastly different.

Stated Goals vs. Policy Outcomes: Trump’s Economy

  • Reduce the National Debt: Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (2017) reduced revenue. Outcome: Debt rose ~33% pre‑pandemic.
  • Eliminate Trade Deficits: Tariffs on allies and China. Outcome: Deficits expanded after 2018.
  • Make Foreigners Pay Tariffs: Universal tariffs (10–60%). Outcome: U.S. consumers bore the cost (avg. ~$1,000+ per household).
  • Mass Reshoring of Manufacturing: Deregulation and tax incentives. Outcome: Limited reshoring; automation and global supply chains blunted effect.

Structural Differences in Policy and Intent

  • Trade Policy:
    • Pre‑War Germany: Autarky via conquest/barter; territorial expansion for raw materials.
    • Trump 2.0: Autarky via tariff wall; universal 10% tariffs, punitive 60–100% on China/Mexico.
  • Mechanism of Control:
    • Pre‑War Germany: Command economy with state control of wages, prices, quotas.
    • Trump 2.0: Market distortion via extreme tariffs and deficit spending; legal uncertainty (IEEPA).
  • Financing/Debt:
    • Pre‑War Germany: Hidden Mefo bills; repayment hinged on war and seizure of assets.
    • Trump 2.0: Overt debt increase (~$5T tax cut extensions + tariffs raising ~$1.6–2.1T), insufficient to offset deficits.
  • Economic Shock:
    • Pre‑War Germany: Inflation suppressed via strict controls.
    • Trump 2.0: Tariffs designed to raise consumer prices ($1,000–$7,600 annually).
  • Risk of Global Conflict:
    • Pre‑War Germany: Survival required military conquest.
    • Trump 2.0: High risk of trade wars and recession, but survival not dependent on war.

Conclusion: Nature of the “Miracle” and Failure Modes

  • Pre‑War Germany: The “miracle” was a war machine fueled by hidden debt and centralized control. Failure mode: exhaustion and external military conflict when debts could no longer be serviced without conquest.
  • Trump 2.0 Economy: The “miracle” is artificial stimulus plus protectionist tariffs. Failure mode: stagflation (high inflation + low growth), fiscal insolvency from un‑offset debt, and fragmentation of global trade.

Key Parallel: Both economies prioritized national ideology over orthodox stability. Germany’s was a centralized war economy; Trump’s is a protectionist, debt‑heavy capitalist economy vulnerable to stagflation and trade fragmentation.

Popular posts from this blog

Conceptual Summary #2: (∂t2​S−c2∇2S+βS3)=σ(x,t)⋅FR​(C[Ψ])

Image
The tests designed to find the Aether—principally the Michelson-Morley experiment (M-M)—would be largely ineffective at detecting the fundamental S field (Substrate) in the Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) framework, though their null results are highly compatible with RST's structure. The reason lies in the distinct conceptual definition and behavior of the two media. The Test: Michelson-Morley and the Aether. The M-M experiment was designed to detect the "aether wind," a predicted change in the speed of light caused by the Earth's motion relative to a stationary, rigid medium—the classical Luminiferous Aether. Classical Aether: A static, absolute reference frame; an elastic, passive, material-like medium that fills space and serves as a carrier for light waves. Predicted Result: Light traveling parallel to Earth's motion through the Aether should be slightly slower than light traveling perpendicular to it. Actual Result (Null Result): No significant differenc...
Read more

Trump has painted a fascinating “economic science fiction” scenario 💥

Image
A sudden $20 trillion influx into U.S. government coffers would be unlike anything in history. This scenario describes an event of unprecedented economic magnitude, with immediate and long‑term effects across the U.S. and global economies. Imagine $20 trillion USD—roughly the size of the entire current U.S. annual GDP—appearing overnight in America’s coffers. The shockwaves would be severe, destabilizing, and unlike anything in history. Let’s break it down clearly, with emphasis on domestic shockwaves, global fallout, and observable indicators. 💥 Scenario Analysis: A $20 Trillion Shock to the U.S. Treasury Imagine $20 trillion USD—roughly the size of the entire current U.S. annual GDP—suddenly appearing in America’s coffers. This unprecedented event would unleash immediate and long-term effects across the U.S. and global economies, driven by inflation, currency collapse, and systemic disruption. Domestic Effects (United States): Hyperinflation: The sudden money suppl...
Read more

The Non-Attraction Model of Gravity: From Attraction to Displacement: RST's Theory of Gravitational Push..

Image
Brief on the Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) RST posits that all of reality—matter, energy, space, and time—emerges from a single, continuous, non-material field called the Substrate (S). Matter: Defined as a σ Soliton, a stable, localized "knot of tension" in the S-field, replacing the concept of a point particle. Energy: Defined as dynamic, propagating tension (waves) in the S-field. Unification: RST views E=mc2 as the conservation of Substrate tension: mass is stored tension; energy is tension in motion. Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) fundamentally redefines gravity as a Substrate tension gradient, which is the mechanism underlying the "buoyant" view of gravity. This explanation also clarifies why the Michelson-Morley (M-M) experiment failed to find the classical Aether, supporting the RST concept of a dynamic Substrate. In essence, gravity is "buoyant" in RST because matter (high tension) sinks into a less-strained S-Field (lower tension...
Read more