“The Reason Solid Objects Are Just Force Fields Is Much More Strange Than You Imagine

Reactive Substrate Theory (RST): One medium. One geometry. One Substrate.

The recent video “The Reason Solid Objects Are Just Force Fields Is Much More Strange Than You Imagine” offers a standard Quantum Field Theory (QFT) and Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) explanation for why matter feels solid. But when examined through the lens of Reactive Substrate Theory (RST), the ontology behind those explanations changes dramatically.

Related Video

1. The Reason Solid Objects Are Just Force Fields

QFT/QED vs. RST: What the Video Gets Right — and What It Gets Wrong

The video correctly describes several observable features of matter:

  • You never physically “touch” anything.
  • Atoms are not tiny solid balls.
  • Solidity is an emergent effect.

RST agrees with all of these phenomenological points. But the underlying explanation — the ontology — is where QFT/QED and RST diverge completely.

Where RST Agrees (Observational Level)

1. No literal contact.
What we call “touch” is not physical contact. It is a reaction of the underlying medium.

2. Matter is not made of tiny solid particles.
Particles are structured excitations, not miniature billiard balls.

3. Solidity is emergent.
It arises from deeper dynamics, not from hard surfaces colliding.

Where RST Disagrees (Ontological Level)

1. QFT treats fields as fundamental. RST does not.
QFT assumes “quantum fields fill space.”
RST states: Spacetime IS the Substrate. Fields are behaviors of that Substrate, not independent entities.

2. QFT says space is mostly empty. RST says there is no emptiness.
QFT: “Atoms are 99.999% empty space.”
RST: The Substrate is continuous everywhere. The “void” is simply low‑tension Substrate.

3. QFT says forces come from virtual photons. RST rejects virtual particles entirely.
QFT: Repulsion = virtual photon exchange.
RST: Repulsion = Substrate tension gradients. No virtual particles. No exchange bosons.

4. QFT treats Pauli exclusion as a mathematical rule. RST treats it as a physical constraint.
QFT: “Fermions cannot occupy the same state.”
RST: The Substrate cannot support overlapping tension configurations.

RST’s Reinterpretation of the Video’s Core Idea

The video claims:

“Solidity is electromagnetic repulsion + Pauli exclusion.”

RST reframes this entirely:

Solidity is the Substrate reaching its tension limit. Geometry pushes back because the medium cannot compress further.

This corrected ontology removes:

  • empty space
  • background spacetime
  • independent fields
  • virtual particles
  • container models
  • dual‑layer physics

In RST there is only:

One medium. One geometry. One Substrate.

RST Summary Table

QFT/QED: Space is mostly empty.
RST: There is no empty space; Substrate = spacetime.

QFT/QED: Fields fill space.
RST: Fields are Substrate behaviors, not entities.

QFT/QED: Virtual photons mediate forces.
RST: Forces = tension gradients in the Substrate.

QFT/QED: Pauli exclusion is a quantum rule.
RST: Exclusion = Substrate stability constraint.

QFT/QED: Particles are field excitations.
RST: Particles are soliton excitations of the Substrate.

QFT/QED: Solidity = EM repulsion.
RST: Solidity = Substrate tension limit.

Bottom Line

The video gets the phenomena right but the ontology wrong.

QFT says: “Force fields in empty space.”
RST says: “There is no empty space. There is only the Substrate, and its geometry is spacetime.”

Everything — matter, forces, fields, curvature — is the Substrate behaving according to its tension dynamics.

Popular posts from this blog

THE GOLDEN BALLROOM/BUNKER

Image
Ben Meiselas reports on the shocking admission by Donald Trump’s DOJ in a court case where the DOJ admits to a secret project underneath the ballroom which they claim is needed to protect Donald Trump’s life for “national security purposes.” "You unlock this door with the key of complicity. Beyond it is another dimension — a dimension of betrayal, of indulgence, of fear. You’re moving into a land of both shadow and substance, of politics and paranoia. You’ve just crossed into… the MAGA Zone." "Tonight’s story: A leader sworn to protect his nation makes a bargain with its enemies. The deal? Silence in the face of nuclear annihilation. No retaliation, no defense — only surrender dressed in secrecy. While citizens live unaware, their president builds a palace beneath the earth, a ballroom of gold, of marble and chandeliers, a masquerade hall for billionaires. But behind the gilded doors lies not music and laughter, but a bomb shelter — a sanctuary for the few, pur...
Read more

Conceptual Summary #2: (∂t2​S−c2∇2S+βS3)=σ(x,t)⋅FR​(C[Ψ])

Image
The tests designed to find the Aether—principally the Michelson-Morley experiment (M-M)—would be largely ineffective at detecting the fundamental S field (Substrate) in the Reactive Substrate Theory (RST) framework, though their null results are highly compatible with RST's structure. The reason lies in the distinct conceptual definition and behavior of the two media. The Test: Michelson-Morley and the Aether. The M-M experiment was designed to detect the "aether wind," a predicted change in the speed of light caused by the Earth's motion relative to a stationary, rigid medium—the classical Luminiferous Aether. Classical Aether: A static, absolute reference frame; an elastic, passive, material-like medium that fills space and serves as a carrier for light waves. Predicted Result: Light traveling parallel to Earth's motion through the Aether should be slightly slower than light traveling perpendicular to it. Actual Result (Null Result): No significant differenc...
Read more

Trump has painted a fascinating “economic science fiction” scenario 💥

Image
A sudden $20 trillion influx into U.S. government coffers would be unlike anything in history. This scenario describes an event of unprecedented economic magnitude, with immediate and long‑term effects across the U.S. and global economies. Imagine $20 trillion USD—roughly the size of the entire current U.S. annual GDP—appearing overnight in America’s coffers. The shockwaves would be severe, destabilizing, and unlike anything in history. Let’s break it down clearly, with emphasis on domestic shockwaves, global fallout, and observable indicators. 💥 Scenario Analysis: A $20 Trillion Shock to the U.S. Treasury Imagine $20 trillion USD—roughly the size of the entire current U.S. annual GDP—suddenly appearing in America’s coffers. This unprecedented event would unleash immediate and long-term effects across the U.S. and global economies, driven by inflation, currency collapse, and systemic disruption. Domestic Effects (United States): Hyperinflation: The sudden money suppl...
Read more