Guilty Until Proven Loyal: Welcome to the 2026 Administrative Wasteland

Three Stooges Jurisprudence: The Structural Crisis of an Indestructible President

How 358 Active Cases Created a Judicial Jam That Liquidated the Rule of Law

In the 2026 legal landscape, this isn't just a theory; it's a structural crisis. Here is the breakdown of why this proposition is currently playing out in the courts:

1. The "Presumption of Regularity" vs. The Presumption of Innocence

In standard law, the government enjoys a Presumption of Regularity (the idea that officials act in good faith), while the citizen enjoys a Presumption of Innocence.

The Conflict: As the second Trump administration faces record-breaking findings of "arbitrary and capricious" conduct and "noncompliance with court orders" (over 68 cases as of late 2025), judges are increasingly stripping the government of its "Good Faith" status.

The Backfire: When the administration argues that the "Deep State" has no right to due process, they effectively poison the well. If the system is "rigged" and "dead," then the very courts Trump relies on to uphold his Presidential Immunity (established in Trump v. United States) lose their moral and legal authority to protect him.

2. The "Expedited Removal" Logic

The administration has aggressively pushed for Expedited Removals and "Guilty Until Proven Innocent" frameworks for migrants and political "enemies."

The Proposition: If the 5th and 14th Amendments (Due Process) are "inconvenient obstacles" for the Executive branch to bypass, then those same amendments cannot be "sacred shields" when the Executive is the defendant.

The Outcome: By normalizing "Authoritarian Legalism"—using technical law to bypass the spirit of the law—the administration creates a world where "Innocence" is no longer a legal status, but a political favor. If you lose political power, you lose the "favor," and since the process is dead, you have no way to win it back.

The Simpsons "Indestructible" Connection

If the "Judicial Doorway" is jammed with so many lawsuits that nobody can get a fair trial, then Presumption of Innocence is just one more oversized novelty germ stuck in the frame.

Mr. Burns feels indestructible because the diseases are stuck, but the moment the door breaks (due process dies), all those illnesses—the lawsuits—fall on him at once. Without the door (the law), there is no balance.

Summary Table: The Death of Process

Traditional Due Process 2026 "Liquidated" Process Impact on the Accused
Presumption of Innocence Presumption of Political Loyalty Innocence is a variable, not a right.
Burden of Proof on State Burden of Proof on the "Target" You must prove you aren't a threat.
Judicial Review Administrative Finality No appeals; the first decision is the last.

The "Reasonable Proposition": Yes. If the administration succeeds in "killing" the slow, cumbersome requirements of due process to achieve its goals, it effectively removes the only armor (Presumption of Innocence) that protects the President himself once he leaves the "indestructible" bubble of the office.

Popular posts from this blog

BRASS KNUCKLES?

Image
Is ICE Carrying Restricted or Non-Standard Weapons? The following items are commonly restricted, discouraged, or prohibited in U.S. law-enforcement use depending on agency policy, state law, and use-of-force standards. Their visible presence on duty gear—especially if not standard-issue—should be documented and reported. Brass knuckles / knuckle-dusters: Often illegal under state law; generally absent from federal agency equipment lists. Blackjacks / saps / batons without policy approval: Some impact weapons are restricted due to high risk of head injury. Weighted gloves: Frequently prohibited as disguised weapons. Fixed-blade knives (outside utility tools): Large or fighting-style knives not issued by the agency. Modified batons: Altered ASPs, weighted tips, or improvised impact devices. Unauthorized chemical sprays: OC blends or crowd-control agents not approved by departm...
Read more

THE GOLDEN BALLROOM/BUNKER

Image
Ben Meiselas reports on the shocking admission by Donald Trump’s DOJ in a court case where the DOJ admits to a secret project underneath the ballroom which they claim is needed to protect Donald Trump’s life for “national security purposes.” "You unlock this door with the key of complicity. Beyond it is another dimension — a dimension of betrayal, of indulgence, of fear. You’re moving into a land of both shadow and substance, of politics and paranoia. You’ve just crossed into… the MAGA Zone." "Tonight’s story: A leader sworn to protect his nation makes a bargain with its enemies. The deal? Silence in the face of nuclear annihilation. No retaliation, no defense — only surrender dressed in secrecy. While citizens live unaware, their president builds a palace beneath the earth, a ballroom of gold, of marble and chandeliers, a masquerade hall for billionaires. But behind the gilded doors lies not music and laughter, but a bomb shelter — a sanctuary for the few, pur...
Read more

If the Constitution is Dead, is the King Unprotected?

Image
The Constitutional Suicide If constitutional legitimacy is abandoned, what happens to the protections derived from it? Authority flows from the Constitution. If Trump & Congress discard the Bill of Rights, they vacate the legal foundation of the Supreme Court.. Does Trump still deserve the presumption of innocence? There is a familiar temptation in moments of political escalation: to treat the Constitution as either sacred and invulnerable, or irrelevant and disposable. Both views misunderstand what a constitution actually is. It is not a magic charm; it is a rule-bound legitimacy machine. When the machine is treated as optional—when constitutional constraint is openly refused as a governing obligation—the system does not become “stronger.” It becomes conceptually incoherent. The purpose of this essay is not to assert that constitutional government has already en...
Read more